แบบทดสอบคำศัพท์ภาษาอังกฤษ (20 ข้อ)
คำสั่ง: เติมคำศัพท์ที่ถูกต้องลงในช่องว่าง (ตอบเป็นตัวพิมพ์เล็กหรือตัวพิมพ์ใหญ่ก็ได้)
JT Blog - logged and managed by Janpha Thadphoothon, a lecturer at the International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand
คำสั่ง: เติมคำศัพท์ที่ถูกต้องลงในช่องว่าง (ตอบเป็นตัวพิมพ์เล็กหรือตัวพิมพ์ใหญ่ก็ได้)
By Tim McDonald
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) constitutes a fundamental shift in the global economic landscape, presenting both a powerful catalyst for productivity and a significant source of labor market disruption. For nations within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), this "algorithmic shift" is particularly salient, given the region's reliance on manufacturing and service industries. Understanding the duality of AI’s impact—job displacement versus job augmentation—is essential for shaping adaptive educational and policy responses, especially for emerging professionals.
The most immediate concern surrounding AI is its capacity for job displacement, particularly through the automation of routine and repetitive tasks. Technologies such as generative AI and machine learning excel at predictable cognitive functions, leading to reduced demand for workers in areas like data entry, administrative support, and traditional customer service roles. Studies tracking AI exposure across ASEAN nations indicate a notable displacement effect in several economies, including Thailand, where automation has, in some sectors, reduced labor demand and pushed less-skilled formal workers toward the informal economy. This process exacerbates existing socioeconomic inequalities if left unmitigated, as it targets roles commonly held by populations with fewer opportunities for immediate re-skilling.
Conversely, AI is simultaneously a powerful engine for job augmentation and economic expansion. AI is projected to increase the GDP of Southeast Asia by
The path to harnessing AI’s opportunities lies in fostering complementarity, where human skills are combined with algorithmic power to achieve superior results. This demands a critical pivot in educational priorities, moving beyond the mastery of technical content to the development of uniquely human competencies. The four core skills for the AI era are: Critical Thinking, essential for evaluating AI outputs for bias and accuracy; Collaboration, necessary for interdisciplinary teamwork involving technical specialists; Communication, required to translate complex technical findings into actionable business strategies; and Adaptability, the commitment to lifelong learning in an environment of accelerating technological change. For Thai college students, prioritizing these soft skills alongside digital literacy will future-proof their careers.
Artificial Intelligence is not merely a technological upgrade but a fundamental restructuring of economic activity. For ASEAN, and particularly for the graduating workforce in Thailand, the challenge is to move swiftly from viewing AI as a threat to recognizing it as an inevitable, powerful tool. By acknowledging the displacement risk in traditional sectors while strategically investing in education focused on human-centric and advanced digital skills, governments, educational institutions, and individuals can collaboratively ensure that the algorithmic shift results in inclusive prosperity rather than deepening inequality. The future of work belongs to those who learn to work with the machine.
Comprehension Questions for Article 1: AI and Jobs
Distinction and Impact: The article identifies both a "displacement effect" and an "augmentation effect" of AI. Explain the difference between these two phenomena and identify which primary labor market segment in the ASEAN context is most vulnerable to displacement.
Socioeconomic Consequences: What specific types of routine tasks are identified as being automated by AI, and how might this displacement effect exacerbate pre-existing socioeconomic inequalities within developing economies like Thailand?
The Complementarity Imperative: What does the article mean by the "complementarity imperative," and how do the four core human skills (Critical Thinking, Collaboration, Communication, and Adaptability) help future workers leverage AI rather than being replaced by it?
Economic Growth vs. Labor Risk: Explain the contradiction presented in the article: how can AI be projected to significantly increase Southeast Asia's GDP while simultaneously posing a threat of job disruption to millions of workers?
Policy and Education Response: Based on the conclusion, what collaborative steps must be taken by educational institutions and governments to ensure that the "algorithmic shift" leads to inclusive prosperity for the whole population, not just a small technologically skilled elite?
Integrating sustainability is fundamentally sound business practice, rooted in the economic pillar of the Triple Bottom Line. Forward-looking corporations recognize that sustainability mitigates existential risks. These risks include the physical dangers of climate change (SDG 13), regulatory penalties, and the reputational damage associated with poor labor practices (SDG 8). Furthermore, the rise of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing means that companies with strong SDG commitments attract capital more easily. By managing resources efficiently and innovating toward sustainable supply chains, businesses unlock long-term value, demonstrate resilience, and secure a competitive advantage in a world where consumers increasingly prioritize ethical sourcing and ecological integrity.
Beyond the financial calculus, corporate strategy must address the 'People' and 'Planet' dimensions. Social responsibility is exemplified by commitments to community development, fair wages, and gender equality (SDG 5). Specifically, engaging in initiatives that promote quality education (SDG 4) or reduce poverty (SDG 1) within a company’s operational sphere cultivates a skilled, stable workforce and strengthens local markets. On the environmental front, the focus is on systemic change, such as adopting the Circular Economy model, which aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible, reducing waste and regenerating natural systems. This strategy directly supports goals related to responsible consumption and production (SDG 12) and climate action (SDG 13). .
Effective SDG integration requires more than issuing a general statement; it demands concrete action and rigorous accountability. Companies must map their material business activities against specific SDG targets and embed these goals into key performance indicators (KPIs) across departments, from R&D to procurement. For instance, a food producer may choose to prioritize SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) by reducing food waste across its entire value chain. Furthermore, transparency through verifiable, standardized sustainability reporting is crucial for maintaining stakeholder trust. This reporting allows investors, consumers, and regulators to accurately measure a corporation's contribution, ensuring that sustainability efforts are genuine and not merely "greenwashing."
The era of business purely driven by short-term shareholder profit is receding. Today, competitive corporate strategy must embrace the systemic challenges outlined by the Sustainable Development Goals. For college students preparing to enter the professional world, understanding the SDGs is foundational to being an effective and responsible leader. The future of global commerce will be defined by enterprises that successfully align their profitability with their planet and people stewardship, demonstrating that sustainable development is not a constraint on growth, but the ultimate pathway to long-term success.
Strategic Rationale (ESG): Explain the core economic rationale for why modern businesses must integrate the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). How does this integration relate to mitigating business risks and attracting investment in the context of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors?
Beyond Compliance: How does incorporating the SDGs into core corporate strategy move a company "beyond optional philanthropy," and what is the difference between this strategic integration and simply complying with existing environmental regulations?
People, Planet, and the Circular Economy: Discuss the practical application of the 'Planet' pillar of sustainability. How does the adoption of the Circular Economy model specifically support two different SDGs mentioned in the article (e.g., SDG 12 and SDG 13)?
Accountability and Greenwashing: The article stresses the importance of rigorous accountability. What concrete organizational actions (like mapping against targets or KPI integration) must a company take to ensure its SDG commitments are genuine, and how does transparent reporting help prevent "greenwashing"?
Long-Term Competitiveness: Synthesize the article's main argument: why is treating the SDGs as a "core strategic driver" and "a prerequisite for long-term competitiveness" a more accurate description of modern business reality than viewing them as simply a cost of doing business?
A clear overview of international commercial terms for buyers and sellers.
This term places the minimum responsibility on the seller. The seller's only obligation is to make the goods available at their own premises (e.g., factory or warehouse). The buyer is responsible for all subsequent costs and risks, including loading the goods and arranging all transport and customs procedures.
Risk Transfer: At the seller's premises, before loading.
The seller delivers the goods to a carrier or another person nominated by the buyer at the seller’s premises or another named place. The seller is responsible for export customs clearance. Risk transfers to the buyer once the goods are delivered to the nominated carrier.
Risk Transfer: When the goods are delivered to the first carrier.
The seller delivers the goods to a carrier they nominate and pays the freight costs to transport the goods to the specified destination. However, the risk of loss or damage transfers from the seller to the buyer when the goods are delivered to the first carrier, not at the destination.
Risk Transfer: When the goods are delivered to the first carrier (even though seller pays for main carriage).
Similar to CPT, but with the additional obligation that the seller must also purchase maximum insurance cover for the buyer's risk of loss or damage during transit. Risk transfers to the buyer when the goods are delivered to the first carrier.
Risk Transfer: When the goods are delivered to the first carrier.
The seller is responsible for arranging carriage and delivering the goods, ready for unloading, at the named destination. The seller bears all risks involved in bringing the goods to the destination. The buyer is responsible for import customs clearance and paying any import duties and taxes.
Risk Transfer: At the named destination, ready for unloading.
This is a new term for 2020, replacing DAT (Delivered at Terminal). The seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the destination and unloading them. The seller bears all risks until after the goods are unloaded. The buyer is responsible for import customs clearance.
Risk Transfer: At the destination, after the goods are unloaded.
This term places the maximum responsibility on the seller. The seller is responsible for everything, including arranging transport, clearing the goods for import, and paying all applicable duties and taxes. The goods are delivered to the buyer's named destination, ready for unloading.
Risk Transfer: At the named destination, cleared for import.
The seller's responsibility ends once the goods are placed alongside the buyer's nominated vessel at the named port of shipment. From that point on, the buyer bears all costs and risks of loss or damage.
Risk Transfer: When goods are alongside the vessel at the port of origin.
The seller is responsible for all costs and risks until the goods are loaded on board the vessel nominated by the buyer at the named port of shipment. Once the goods are on board, the risk transfers to the buyer.
Risk Transfer: When goods are on board the vessel at the port of origin.
The seller must pay the costs and freight to bring the goods to the named port of destination. However, the risk transfers to the buyer once the goods are on board the vessel at the port of shipment.
Risk Transfer: When goods are on board the vessel at the port of origin.
Similar to CFR, but with the additional obligation that the seller must also purchase minimum insurance cover for the buyer's risk of loss or damage during transit. Risk still transfers to the buyer once the goods are on board the vessel.
Risk Transfer: When goods are on board the vessel at the port of origin.
The key difference is responsibility for import duties and taxes. Under DAP (Delivered at Place), the buyer handles these costs. Under DDP (Delivered Duty Paid), the seller is responsible for them.
The only difference is insurance. Under CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight), the seller must purchase insurance for the goods during transit for the buyer's benefit. Under CFR (Cost and Freight), the seller is not required to do so.
The only difference is insurance. Under CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To), the seller must purchase insurance (to a high level of cover) for the buyer. Under CPT (Carriage Paid To), the seller is not required to do so.
The main difference is who pays for the main carriage and insurance. Under FOB (Free On Board), the buyer arranges and pays for the main sea transport and any insurance from the port of origin. Under CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight), the seller arranges and pays for these items to the port of destination.
Vocabulary Practice Quiz for Thai Students แบบทดสอบคำศัพท์ภาษาอังกฤษ (20 ข้อ) คำสั่ง: เ...