Monday, June 6, 2016

Meno Dilemma: Questions and Answers

Meno Dilemma: Regarding the Nature of Questions and Answers


Janpha Thadphoothon

This is a kind of riddles. People often ask questions and they expect to get some answers.

In education and many aspects of life, people are expected to answer the questions. In exams, students are considered excellent if they could answer the questions.

However, as we know, questions themselves are, sometimes, more interesting than answers.


Photo credit: www.antiqbook.com

Let's learn from one of the most brilliant minds, Ludwig Wittgenstein, see what he had said about questions and answers in the context of logic.

In  Tractatus logico-philosophicus or the "Treaty of Logical Philosophy"

Section 6.5

For an answer which cannot be expressed the question too cannot be expressed.
The riddle does not exist.
If a question can be put at all, then it can also be answered.

Elsewhere it is put this way:

6.5 When the answer cannot be put into words, neither can the question be put into words. The riddle does not exist. If a question can be framed at all, it is also possible to answer it.

This is also known as MENO dilemma  It goes something like this. If you ask a question, you already know the answer. You may argue you do not know the answer. Then, again, how can you ask the question in the first place.

In 6.522, he put it that:


There are, indeed, things that cannot be put into words. They make themselves manifest. They are what is mystical.


Even in places where all scientific rules as we know them seem to be obsolete, humans may als attempt to raise questions: why? how or what?

References


http://sqapo.com/wittgenstein.htm

Friday, June 3, 2016

On Nietzche’s Theory of Superman

On Nietzche’s Theory of Superman

Janpha Thadphoothon

Admittedly, bearing well in mind how meager my perception of his philosophies is, still, I could not resist my temptation and natural curiosity; thus, I came up with this story.

One may wonder who Nietzsche was?



Photo credit:
https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/10/15/nietzsche-on-difficulty/



Friedrich (Wilhelm) Nietzsche (1844-1900), German philosopher, poet, and classical philologist, and one of the most provocative and influential thinkers of the 19th century.

Throughout mankind’s history the search for excellence has been our central theme; the Spartans of ancient Greek had cruel ways of selecting fittest generations for wars. By this I refer to the search for perfection of man; the dynamic bio-socio-techno evolved specie --- from homo sapient to homotech excellentia (my term, by the way), which can create countless possibilities in terms of mankind development.

We all have seen the Hollywood series of Superman or Spiderman, but were those too science fictionalised or ambitious to be taken seriously?


A lot of people who used to laugh and/or are laughing at his radical stance regarding the future of man may have to readjust their stances. At this point in time, Fewer and fewer people dare saying that this possibility is obsolete.

Back in the turn of the 20th century, very few people realized this possibility. However, with the advancement of cloning technology and genetic engineering plus artificial intelligence movements, and other frontiers of sciences, uncertainties have risen; things could be as he and his precedents have predicted.


Probably Marx and Hegel et al may be wrong in asserting that only through the raising of all humanity to a higher level in social life the liberation of all of humanity can lead to the formation of a new type of man. They were partly correct, nevertheless. Those who were in similar veils should embrace Vygotsky who used to write that Nietzsche’s wild imagination was erroneous had lost the opportunity to readjust his tenet or proposition.

According to Vygotsky (p. 183), Nietzsche posited that:

“ evolution did not exhausted its possibilities when it creates man and that the modern type of personality is not the highest achievement and the last word in the process of development…”

Nietzsche, therefore, arrived at the conclusion that:
 

“ A new creature can arise during the process of evolution, a superman, who will have the same relation to contemporary man, as contemporary man has to the ape.”

Even if his prediction was true, no one can guarantee that the first prototype of such being will communicate in English and how.

Up to this point, I should like to borrow Professor Andrew Lian’s bon mot: So what?

Well, nothing much, really, I am just wondering about the future of education in general.

One teacher I know, many years ago, used to feel upset when students did not pay attention to his lecture, and in addition to his lengthy explanation of why we students should study and why schools exist, he predicted that in the near future a technology or device which can enable us to down any information we need into our perception, including languages and mathematics.

I admire those computer nerds and absentminded cum die-hard scientists who are spending their time on this quest. I only wish they succeeded within my lifetime --- and theirs.

By jove, if it were going to take a hundred years or so, my contemporaries and I, frankly speaking, envy those who could live that long to be materialized. Have a nice day!

References


http://home.earthlink.net/~pdistan/howp_9.html Accessed 6/09/01.

http://www.mb-soft.com/believe/txn/deathgod.htm. Accessed 6/09/01.

Vygotsky, Lev. “The Socialist Alteration of Man” in The Vygotsky Reader edited by Rene vander Veer and Jaan Valsiner (1998) Blackwell, Oxford.

Paradigm Has Shifted

Paradigm Has Shifted

Janpha Thadphoothon


What is a paradigm? It's simply a model of something.

What do we mean by 'paradigm shift'?

A paradigm shift is a big change --- a fundamental change in approach or underlying assumptions or belief.



Photo credit: http://humansarefree.com/2016/04/understanding-new-world-order-who-what.html


Most of us, if we remain true to ourselves, feel that things have radically changed.

Animal-unfriendly Expressions in English

Animal-unfriendly Expressions in English

Janpha Thadphoothon

The language we use is not just a system of signs or symbols. it often reflect our social construction.

Language as a symbolic system does not function in vacuum. There are truckloads of values and ideas embedded into it. Often such historical and experiential embodiment is the result of its use in society. Very often, we do not think much about it. But when we carefully look into our language we might be more aware of our construction ans perhaps our shortcomings.

Language has power. It reflects values and reinforces values. One example of the power of language can be seen in various animal-unfriendly expressions found in English. In Thai, we have a saying โง่เหมือนควาย or as stupid as a buffalo.

In many languages, we can often notice the biases against animals.

Three such animal-unfriendly expressions in English are:




a. There’s more than one way to skin a cat. (This means that we can use different ways to achieve our goals.)

b. Kill two birds with one stone. (This means to perform two tasks or achieve two goals at the same time.)

c. Don’t be a sitting duck. (This means someone or something likely to be attacked or unable to put up a defense. A duck hunter knows that if a duck is sitting still, it’s a much easier target than a duck in flight.)

In semiotics, we have learned how discourse represents and constructs society. The way we use those expressions, if anything, reflects our attitudes and mindset of those animals.

Bearing this bias in mind, as a teacher, you may ask your students to find the biased expressions or proverbs in Thai or in English. Let them discuss and unpack the many values embedded in them.


Wednesday, June 1, 2016

The Ari Cult and the Bagan Civilization

The Ari Cult and the Bagan Civilization





คำผวน ในภาษาเวียดนาม (Spoonerism in Vietnamese)

คำผวน ในภาษาเวียดนาม (Word Play in Vietnamese)

จันทร์พา ทัดภูธร


การนำคำมาเล่น หรือ word play มีด้วยกันทุกชาติทุกภาษา การผวนคำ หรือ spoonerism คือรูปแบบหนึ่งของการเล่นคำ

ในภาษาอังกฤษ ก็มีการผวนคำเช่นกัน เรียกว่า spoonerism ครับ

ตัวอย่างที่นิยมยกกันมาบ่อย ๆ คือ  "The Lord is a shoving leopard" ซึ่งผวนมาจากประโยคที่ว่า
"The Lord is a loving shepherd."

ภาษาไทยเรานิยมเล่นคำผวนมาก เช่น อะรีดอย = อร่อยดี

ภาษาเวียดนามก็เช่นกัน ผมขอแนะนำรูปแบบการเล่นคำ 2 แบบ คือ

1. nói lái นอยไหล คือ การสลับคำ แปลตรงตัวว่า พูดใหม่ / พูดอีกครั้ง โดยสลับคำหลังไปหน้า หน้าไปหลัง แต่คงตำแหน่งของเสียงวรรณยุกต์ เช่น

chửa hoang ( การอยู่กินด้วยกันโดยไม่ได้สมรส  - (ท้องเถื่อน) ผวนเป็น hoảng chưa (กลัวยัง)
คำว่า chửa (ฉัว)  แปลว่า ท้อง ส่วน hoang  (ฮวง) แปลว่า เถื่อน

hoảng  แปลว่า กลัว + chưa  ยัง

mèo cái แมวไก๋ แปลว่า ไก่ตัวเมีย
ผวนเป็น mài kéo ไมแก๋ว แปลว่า ลับกรรไกร

2. เป็นการเล่นคำของเด็ก ชาวเวียดนาม โดยนำคำที่คิดขึ้นมาวางไว้หน้าคำหลัก แล้วผวนกลับพยัญชนะต้นและเสียงสัมผัส เช่น

la phở  - lơ phả   ลาเฝอ - เลอฝา
(เฝอ คือ อาหารคล้ายก๋วยเตี๋ยว)

แบบนี้คล้ายกับการผวนคำของไทยมากที่สุด ต่างรงที่นำคำอื่นมานำหน้าคำหลัก กล่าวคืออีกฝั่งอาจไม่มีความหมายก็ได้ เช่น  จำใด (ไม่มีความหมาย)  ผวนเป็น ใจดำ (มีความหมาย)




อ้างอิง

"Nói lái" https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%B3i_l%C3%A1i


International Trade Vocabulary Masterclass App

📦 International Trade Vocabulary Masterclass Study key commercial terms, trade documents, logistics terminology, and ...